Pretty wonderful that a automobile flipped at freeway speeds and nobody was seriously hurt. Are any charges pending in opposition to the horse owner? I don't need to cast aspersions with out proof, so I will not title the enterprise, but it appears pretty obvious a guess that the horses had been at a certain ranch and escaped. If that's the case, the owners possible board them there and the responsibility belongs with the ranch. Is probably not the owner's/homeowners' fault. Sure, the majority of horses https://just6f.com/statues/ in the realm are boarded, not stabled on horse proprietor property. Pretty terrible time for these drivers, although. That is awful, & it may've been even worse. The property on both sides belongs to Stanford U. PVEC is a bunch of sub-barns and there's no less than one if not more additional operations farther up Ansel Lane. 280 the horses would have come from. Might you imagine that someone meant their horses to be killed on the freeway? Too dangerous it took the CHP an hour to cast the SIG alert - it appears they didn't react in time to prevent continuing tragedy? Only for the record they didn't come from PVTC! So forged all of the aspersions you want! I didn't "blame" anyone, nor did I "think about" someone wished hurt, note my use of the phrase "escape". I nonetheless doubt that would be the case. I used to be referring to @amazing that thought the homeowners could be liable. As for my guess, after wanting at the map, I am glad I didn't say the name, the one I used to be guessing is on the south facet of 280, with the long lease. You'd need more than a handful of fingers to depend. My error stems from being a north peninsula gal, I still consider 280 as north/south! The information reported this morning that they received free from Webb Ranch. I am more accustomed to the south aspect stables; I do not know which is the obvious (ie.. Someone thought they had latched a gate, but hadn't. The SJ Mercury News stories that they wandered a mile from the corral the place a gate was left loose. Mea culpa -- I used to be reacting defensively in safety of the ranch I rode at as a kid (WR) which is on the "south" aspect of 280. From what I know, all their horses are also on the other side of the creek from the 280 north on- ramp. There are going to be a variety of unhappy youngsters as well as us adult horse lovers. I'm feeling very bad for the ranch and all the kids who rode these horses in lessons. I'm not feeling as dangerous for the ranch homeowners & kids who rode the horses as I am feeling for the horses themselves & the poor individuals who hit them. Glad no human lives have been lost and really sad for the loss of the horses. Sorry for my reactivity in earlier submit. Shocked anybody would blame the horse owners. Hazards like deer (and, in the past, horses and cattle and even pedestrians and stalled automobiles) appear on 280. I attempt not to drive in the shoulder lane, particularly at night time, to give myself more room to maneuver should a deer certain into the roadway. Many of us use 280 as a speedway! What are they going to do if they hit a deer - sue the deer? I'm a long time Woodside and Portola Valley Resident. For the past 15 years I have had reason to be on the 280 between the hours of 4:30-6:30am and that i can tell you not many maintain the velocity limit. Speed and over driving the reach of headlights are possible culprits, so please don't blame the poor horses and their owners. It's as if drivers think that few drivers on the highway make it the Autobahn! They should deal with it as though they're driving in icy situations - Decelerate. The velocity restrict is about because the safe velocity below preferrred circumstances, which incorporates daylight, anything lower than best requires slower speeds. Perhaps if the CHP would spend more time in the early hours monitoring traffic we would have less gridlock that begins with wildlife (or relatively lately domesticated animals) being hit and killed.
